of (5)

Amritsar based research institute, namely, Guru Arjan Dev Institute of Development Studies, added another feather to her cap. Today institute released its second annual publication of the year. The book entitled India’s Water Crisis: Time for a Rethink is authored by the renowned agricultural economist and Director General of the institute Dr Gursharan Singh Kainth. The book with 9781646617852 as ISBN  is published by Xpress Publishing – an imprint of Notion Press.

Earlier book entitled Recycling of waste water and reuse system published by Bharati Publication, New Delhi was released by the institute. Three books are entitled Education for Sustainable Development; Technology led Financial Inclusion and Elementary Education: Needs Renewed Push are likely to be released by the institute before the end of current year.

Water poised itself the centre if civilization since time immemorial. The limited amount of useable water on this plant is becoming scarcer with growing industrialization, population exploitation and irrational use. This captivating book “India’s Water Crisis: Task Ahead” takes readers through insights of water management required for sustenance of humanity and analysis of sustainable development in the context of Indian water resources. It brings together the information on the technological advances in water management.

There is well known adage – Waste not, Want not. The book added, Waste not the Waste and do not untouch an untouchable.  Giving human touch to technology has never harmed anyone.

Sh  G Nageswara Rao Chairman Atomic Energy Regulatory Board Mumbai in his forward to the book added that the book would be very beneficial towards spreading awareness on the crucial aspects of water management required for sustenance of humanity. It provides the statistics and brings together the information on the technological advances in water management.  It will be very good reference to the key stakeholders as well as academicians and research scholars.  The wide range of topics covered is a testimony to the dedication and commitment of the author to the nation.

 

 8222_cover_0902736001567072909.pdf

Read more…
Today we wake, deliberate, hang our heads in shame and then stick it back into the metaphoric sand for the next call, a year hence. We, the feather buddies with an environmental itch, brace ourselves for a lifetime of exasperation. We are convinced that policy makers do not believe in environment protection, for themselves or for the masses. But, this one time, my hopes soar that despite being relegated under a dual charge, deigned as undermining of the importance of the Ministry of Environment and Forests, acche din ayenge.
I believe that the Ministry of Environment should be disassociated from the Forests (presently MoEF). Both domains are vast areas of work. Forests have issues that relate to livelihoods and are better placed as a subject of rural development. The ‘Union Forests’ outfit can act as an international agency or a regulatory body and establish norms and rewards to be meted out, such as mandating a minimum 33 per cent green cover in every state. The Ministry of Environment could then evolve as a scientific body from its present semi-scientific avatar and build its core around research related to air, water and soil pollution to provide policy directions, holding states responsible for faulty execution. Today, the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) is nothing but a rudderless organization. Not only is it unable to crack down on defaulting units, it can barely throw up data, even several years old, on easily measurable parameters such as air quality status of cities around the nation. The Delhi-Beijing air quality comparison unfolded this winter, with Indian scientists tumbling over themselves, in an effort to prove that Delhi’s air quality is ‘bad’ or ‘not-so-bad’ or ‘better than so-and-so country’ and so - till the media decided to end it all by withdrawing printing space. But, is real-time online data, 24x7 on every city of India not a possibility? For all we know, Kanpur could be 20 times worse than Delhi! I can hope that once a powerful Union Environment Ministry is created, with CPCB being in sole charge of measuring and making real-time data available to the nation, a true clean-up act will commence. And once the CPCB enables data transparency at macro and micro-level, the ‘knowledge is power’ portal will be a veritable Mecca for the concerned masses. With a new government that mandates the cleaning of the rivers, surely cleaning of the soil and the groundwater of the nation also holds resonance.
Then again are the duplicating efforts of each scientific Ministry.  Climate change concerns are tackled by the Department of Science and Technology, the Ministry of Earth Sciences and MoEF with cells performing at varied levels in all these fund-rich bastions. Currently, air quality measurements, with ‘my-daddy-strongest’ undertones is doing its inter-ministerial rounds. I hold the Prime Minister's words very close to my heart when he says that he would always be there for all of us – the 125 crore Indians. I am sure he will find it within himself to include the Godavari, the Ganga of the south; the Cauvery;the dying Adyar and many other rivers in his agenda of river cleaning, rechristening ‘Water Resource and Ganga Cleaning’ as ‘Ministry for Surface Water’. The ground water and all its complexities can be dealt with by a Groundwater Ministry with the database and research being thrown up by the present Central Ground Water Board. For a nation that is desperately trying to control inflation, dubious spending on similar subjects seems to be, mildly put, superfluous. 
Speaking of scientific ministries, one may encounter especially talented individuals, wilting within the conundrum of administrative charge. What astounds me is why scientific ministries, which include environment, should see India’s scarce and far between scientists being wasted at the altar of administration, 'processing' files. Surely able officers that spend many formative years in preparing for competitive examinations (a well-defined industry in this country) to serve administratively can be assigned scientific responsibilities – with scientific consultations of course, if and when required.  Scientists should do science – period.
 
And yes, the effects of pollution are insidious, difficult to quantify and debatable. From mere lethargy to serious ailment, man-hours lost are barely comprehended let alone computed. The World Health Organization and many allied international agencies point towards a high number of respiratory and heart related ailments in India that are directly ascribable to pollution – which together reportedly kills the highest number of Indians. The Prime Minister, I am sure would understand that it is no fun ruling over a disintegrating lot of sicklings who would be ever-absent from duty.
In sum, strengthening a new and improved Ministry of Environment; singling out three or four foremost areas for environmental battle ground within an ascribed time period; bringing in transparency in basic air-water-soil quality data; and, enlisting the help of science in problem solving may lead to the salvation of our health-compromised masses.
Read more…

3 Ways to Improve Social Enterprises

India is a country of Sharp contrasts.On one hand one of its richest state Gujarat boasts about its economic turn around,but on the other hand a UN health report reveals that large number of Gujarati women are malnourished. Likewise India is rated as the biggest source of Billionaires in S.E.Asia, by Forbes,yet  around 40% of the total Indian population livebelow poverty lineWhat lacks is a proper framework of development that includes social alleviation policies and social innovations.
 
poverty.jpg
Image- Poverty
Social Enterprise is not new. Vinoba Bhave, the founder of India’s Land Gift Movement, Robert Owen, the founder of cooperative movement and Florence Nightingale, founder of first nursing school and developer of modern nursing practices are few examples of Social entrepreneurship. The issues that social enterprises deal with are social justice, inequality and inclusion,  environment, trade justice and development.
 
Short-Comings of Existing Framework
In the twentieth century Social Enterprise has embraced charities and community organisations.
1.The way social enterprises operate now is often to address the  limitationsof public service provision. Some social enterprises, based on charities, are established to meet needs. 
 
2.The state Governments find it difficult to cope with diversity of needs of users, 
especially niche and specialist needs as consumers have become increasingly aware of their distinct needs and able to voice their demands. Social enterprises are often developed just to cater for needs which the state does not fully meet.
 
3.The state Governments create a culture of paternalism, encouraging a dependency culture.Here Social enterprises  come to see themselves as recipients of solutions delivered to them by professionals rather than participants in creating solutions. 
 

However, Social enterprises should have their own Business values built on a model of self-help that encourages people to be participants in creating solutions for one another. They should mobilise peer-to-peer systems of support, for example, rather than relying on 
professionals. Thus,Government needs a framework for social innovation that improves social outcomes.

 
Strategies to Improve the Framework
 
1. Larger Scale = Greater Impact  
In-order to strengthen the existing Social Enterprises,these businesses should Champion the Economics of Scale.Enterprises should operate at a National level and a become household name.Organizations must find ways of clustering together, helping themselves to form alliances, federations and networks that give them scale. The Grameen Bank has achieved this, first in Bangladesh and then around the world. Grameen is impressive because it operates at scale.
 
2.Social Innovation Platforms = Social Enterprise State

The government should create Social Innovation platforms at Public Level. This will bring together the public sector, private companies and social enterprises to address shared problems and opportunities, such as provision of home- based services for the elderly, to combat social isolation. A shift towards more local governance such as local carbon trusts to drive down CO2 emissions– would create the conditions for much more local social innovation.

3. More Socially Responsible Businesses = More Disruptive Innovation
Developing Goods and Providing services at radically low costs, so as to bring them in reach of poor consumers.
->The Clinton Global Initiative has done something like this with Aids drugs for the poor, by finding a way to eliminate middle men and distributors so as to get the generic versions of drugs more cheaply. 
->Fair-trade producers such as Café Direct have shown how corporate supply chains can be reorganised to provide commodity producers in the developing world with a higher margin. 

 
Conclusion
Thus,Social enterprises can challenge mainstream businesses to operate in more socially responsible ways. Also, they can inspire consumers to demand such products.
 

Bill Gates, the founder of Microsoft, had once said that If you believe that each life has equal value then it is disgusting to learn than some lives are worth saving and some not…We asked “How could the world let these children die?
Bill and Melinda Gates foundation since then has worked  to find approaches that caters to the needs of the poor,and that generates profits for business. 
Some of the recent examples of successful social ventures are -  The Grameen Bank by Muhammad Yunus, Ashoka: The Innovators for the Public by Bill Drayton, Youth United by Jyotindra Nath, Rand De by Ramakrishna and Smita Ram, SKS Microfinance by Vikram Akula and Roozi.com by Nick Reder, Brent Freeman and Norma La Rosa has popularized the term. 
Read more…
Dear All,

A gazette notification of 26th November 2009 exempts 190 plant species from the purview of the National Biodiveristy Act 2002 if traded as commodities (that is for exports). Many of the plants on this list are threatened. The notification is on the NBA website -Biological Resources notified as normally traded commodities under section 40 of BD Act, 2002 http://www.nbaindia .org/notificatio n.htm

Also this list has been prepared in-transparently without a due process and many senior government officials, state biodiversity boards are not aware of it.

The fact that India trades value added products such as spices, resins, coffee seeds etc is acceptable but are we trading Banyan and Peepal trees? In addition are we trading threatened plants such as Chlorophytum borivilianum and many others. We did compare it with the threatened list on the NBRI website and found that many of them match.

To confirm this, those of you who are well informed about the threatened plants of India, can you please throw some light on this and if possible help identify the threatened plants on this notification or send/give a link to a list of an updated threatened plant species. It will be most helpful.

Looking forward to your comments,

Warm Regards,
Bhargavi S.Rao
bhargavi_srao@yahoo.com
Read more…
This is a funny initiative taken up by the mining giant Vedanta under its Corporate Social Responsibility programme, I find it very hilarious for the facts that, first it is an exotic species, secondly the communities have no control over its market, thirdly it will effect the local food crops, and what about the propagation of this? Do the communities have the nursery and other facilities and having known the impacts of introduction of exotics (animals and plants) how far do you recommend the introduction of an exotic species like this in ecologically sensitive areas like forests!!!! can some one tell me this. Please read the article in which this initiative was shown in a very colourful way. This is my view would like to know your perspective too.. Thank you.http://kalingatimes.com/business_news/news2/20090110_Farmers_grow_strawberry_in_Kalahandi_district.htm
Read more…