Blog

One of my favorite professors at school, Dr. Tim Henry, who practiced dentistry for a while, and now teaches anatomy & physiology, amongst other subjects, lent form to a nebulous idea that had been floating in my mind for a long time. He views the imbalance on our planet akin to imbalance in our body - disease as a dangerous shift from a stable condition of health or 'homeostasis'. As I read further into the wise writings of eminent scientists who have been diagnosing the illnesses of the earth over the past few decades, I realize some disturbing patterns...

Extending Dr. Henry's idea further, one may 'postulate' that the variety of afflictions now tormenting various segments across the globe are symptoms, in the least, of something much worse; only collateral damages - but not the root of the problem. Al Gore, the fearless knight of the American climate crusades, portrays climate change as a planetary 'fever'. It will be of interest for you to note that fevers are not diseases, but symptoms, and rather 'side effects' of a more insidious illness. The hysteria developing over climate change is much like the Western medical approach to resolving a situation where a patient suffers from a fever. To attack symptoms is a form of urgent action, which is not necessarily the right action always [especially when the disease is causing much more damage than just a merely harmless increase in temperature].

Our planet is currently suffering from a disease analogous to what ails humans in the form of Acquired Immuno Deficiency Syndrome AIDS. The planet is failing in more than one way - the melting of ice bergs, hotter summers, stronger cyclonic storms, and more unpredictable weather, lower biodiversity, lower crop yields, spread of invasive species, and the like. The symptoms are numerous - much like the multi-faceted failure of the AIDS patient, our planet is probably unable to deal with a gang of remarkably varied criminals, each attacking a separate organ.

I cannot even begin to understand the complexity of this sinister issue - the climate scientist is just as much in a quandary as those doctors who faced the complex situations of diagnosing their first AIDS patients. The Earth-doctors feel similarly helpless and flummoxed, having never encountered something so powerfully devastating. What hope can they give? What hope can I or you give each other in times that we are numb to pain, but not immune to it? The quest for truth, for justice and fairness has already been lost in the din of the crowded marketplaces of a million glittering pieces of glass. We can live in denial - like the first victims of HIV that do not perceive the symptoms for quite a while before the deathly virus gains foothold. Isn't it so easy to deny such a misery than accept it and do what it takes to counter it? Does our civilization have the moral courage for such actions?

Does our civilization have any hope? What hope can we give to each other if our planet has been similarly diagnosed with an incurable, stigmatic illness - one whose effects are not even manifest completely yet. What plan of action does our world now choose - to keep exercising the economic 'biceps', bailing it out occasionally with protein shakes and steroids, while ignoring the crucial ethical leukocytes, and educational nerves? An AIDS patient might have avoided the illness by wrapping tight in a moral fabric too strongly knit to keep breathing in colorful freedom. What kind of devices would have kept the earth from contracting such a promiscuous illness that leads to its failure to sustain itself?

The reluctant messenger of truth has a short lifespan and needs more than bulletproof jackets. It would probably be worthy to criticize my ideas as pessimistic and nihilistic, only if it were true that we have been faithful to our planet. As messengers of the betrayal, climate scientists and writers are often caustically rebuked for throwing cinders onto a peaceful relationship. The enigmatic analogue I present herein may be meaningless and astringent, but I am hoping that a sharper intellect will dissect this piece of linguistic flesh in a future post-mortem to reveal deeper truths, or shallow lies, of the situation that presents itself to us today - an ailing planet, a sick economy, and the critical failure of intellectual courage to go beyond the symptoms and signs, and attack the germs of greed, anger, malice, envy, and lust. Are we training smart farmers who can cultivate a future world, uprooting evil weeds and destroying its sinful seeds? If we cannot be such farmers, will we afford the siesta that could be?