I would like to draw the attention of the forum on some of the news items posted in last 2 or 3 days by Chandra on a possible shift in India's stance in climate change negotiations?There had been severe criticism in the media after Jairam Ramesh's recent mail to the PM on India's position on climate change negotiations.http://newsx.com/story/64873http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/environment/developmental-issues/Cong-distanced-itself-from-jairams-recommendation-on-climate-change/articleshow/5139755.cmshttp://www.cseindia.org/equitywatch/australian_proposal.htmUp until now, our stand was that while we would seriously make an attempt to cut down our emissions, but not agree to any quantified schedule for GHG emission cuts.However, the Australians have been negotiating with a proposal, mainly to satisfy US demands, with a call to every country to specify a scheduled quantified emission target between now and 2050. Australians suggested last month that the emerging economies would be allowed to set their own binding targets to cut their emissions. Some observers feel that the Australian proposal in some ways intends to bring India and China into the list of Annex 1 nations of Kyoto Protocol.http://www.aclimateforchange.org/profiles/blogs/australia-climate-negotiationsApparently, US and developed nations have reacted positively to the Australian viewhttp://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/45450bde-bcd5-11de-a7ec-00144feab49a.htmlLast month India, while welcoming the Australian attempts to bring US to the negotiating table, opposed the attempts to treat India on par with Annex 1 (Kyoto Protocol) nations -http://www.deccanchronicle.com/latest-news/india-asks-australia-clarify-statement-climate-change-measures-086Has India really diluted its stand following the letter by Ramesh to the PM? Ramesh came out defensive in the media today, on what he meant by possibly suggesting that India move to negotiate as one of the G-20 block rather than G-77 block!http://www.hindu.com/2009/10/20/stories/2009102056480100.htmhttp://in.news.yahoo.com/43/20091019/836/tbs-industrialised-countries-must-cut-em.htmlDoes this forum have a view on the direction which climate change negotiations are heading to! Should India agree to a reduction in its projected emission target to be achieved in next 40 years (2050) as the Australians have suggested? And do we agree with Jairam Ramesh's slightly shifted and nuanced stance on the pre-COP 15 negotiations to negotiate as one of G-20 Block members?

You need to be a member of Paryavaran.com- Indian Environment Network to add comments!

Join Paryavaran.com- Indian Environment Network

Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • India should stand firm in confronting developed and polluting countries on their commitments to GHG emission.

    However, our stand should not be a license to our polluting industries to carry out business as usual. The carbon footprint of many of our industries including power and steel have to improve even if we don't accept an emmission target.

    To me, the new potential UNFCC protocol should be an opportunity for Indian businesses and enterprises to take lead in developing solutions to mitigate climate change. We should not be in a situation, where a decade from now, we are still looking towards the west seeking technology transfers because we cannot develop one for ourselves! Its time for our government, corporations and businesses with global ambitions, our town planners, our universities, our NGOs and individuals to show the way.

    Targets or not, India needs to show greater resolve and commitment to rationalise its own performance in climate change mitigation.
    target.to
    The domain name 'target.to' is parked at Register.TO Domain Registrar
  • Priorities of Mr.Jairam Ramesh, Minister, Environment and Forests :
    1. significantly improve India's natural forest cover;
    2. establish an environmental grievance redressal regime that is effective, speedy and fair;
    3. chalk out an effective climate change agenda that is both pragmatic and self-sustaining.
  • Already Mr.Ramesh has taken U turn :) Relax.
  • Taking actions to reduce climate change is going to be a tough business. On one hand one can never disregard the need for considerations of differential responsibilities and on the other hand it is clearly the need of the hour for even the developing countries to think seriously about GHG reductions.
    Parties like US do not appear to understand their responsibilities and are not working positively towards coming together as one planet to resolve the problems. As a nation, India needs to hold its ground and the current stand. But at the same time, being a responsible nation, we should take serious efforts to reduce the entropy that is being created as an outcome of growth economy and uncontrolled development. After all, the effects of climate change though are global, they first appear as changes in local environment and with the current rate of emissions, we are only making it more difficult for ourselves...
  • I feel that India wants to be the deal-maker and in order to hold on to that it has to move with the current diplomacy on the negotiating table. I feel what Mr Jairam Ramesh has expressed his personal feelings overwhelmed by US' warmth and what has leaked is not India's stand.

    I personally appreciate the level of diplomacy India reached within the last five years especially around climate change negotiations under the leadership of Mr Shyam Saran, which secured a high seat for India at the negotiating table. The feelings of Mr Jairam Ramesh is going to somewhat dilute India's stand but an official clarification from Mr Manmohan Singh would clear the clouds. I have sympathy with the India's negotiating team at MEF who are facing the brunt of this news. India will continue to lead the G-77 bloc and come out with an agreement which will benefit mankind in general and the poor in particular.
  • I dont think India should accept for any quantified targets in negotiations. The current stand of India on this issue is absolutely fine, do not require any shifts. Infact, as we can see under CDM/Volutary carbon mechanisms, there are huge number of projects undertaken/budding in RE/Emission free sectors in India. This clearly indicates our voluntary action to invest in these technologies. Adding to this, Indian govt last year announced its climate policy, promoting more Renewable energy/Energy efficiency activities in the country as part of their action to mitigate climate change. On contrary, the Joint implementation program under kyoto, aimed for implementation of RE/emission free projects in developed nations, still dormant. This is probably due to their heavy dependency on fossils and indicates, their priority seems not much on GHG reductions on their own and the matter of sincerity towards GHG reductions (Just want to pay some bucks to developing nations to do their job).

    Here my point is, Developed nations seems to pass on some of their burden to developing nations, rather than holding the real responsibility. After all, they are mostly causative of industrialization and anthropogenic climate change.
This reply was deleted.