|
The technology is expensiveWhether in the form of water-heating solar panels, or photovoltaics to generate electricity from sunlight (like in the accompanying image of solar panels on the Space Station), the solar energy technology is relatively expensive compared to, say, coal-fired power plants. Electricity costs in the United States average 7 cents per kilowatt-hour. A currently advertised inexpensive 3 kilowatt (peak) solar system bought in California, after a hefty state rebate and tax incentive, will cost $6,552. Running at an average of 30% of peak capacity (no sun at night, cloudiness, etc.), this system will take ten years before it costs less than buying all electricity from utilities. | |
| Of course there are some applications where solar energy makes economic sense. Photovoltaics power remote data storage or transmitter devices where electricity is not available. Some very poor villages in Africa use inexpensive solar collection devices for cooking and heating of water. Passive solar design of new houses and buildings can greatly reduce energy costs since, through smart design, much of the house becomes, in effect, a solar collector. | |
Investment in the Future?Even if a solar system could be installed for a cost that would be paid back in only 3 years, how many people would buy it? Most people would rather pay less now, rather than invest in something where the payoff is years down the road. First-time home buyers are usually trying to buy as large and as nice a house as possible for what they can afford in a monthly payment. Barring a massive change in public sentiment, it will probably take government regulation to force higher efficiency standards on the building industry, since the public is unlikely to voluntarily make such an investment. There will, of course, always be some people who will opt to make these investments voluntarily.What About Solar Collectors in Space?Greater amounts of sunlight can be collected in outer space, where a satellite can be kept in the sun continuously, and clouds are not a factor. But the roughly factor of three increase in energy intensity is offset by inefficiencies in transmitting that energy to the ground. If it was transmitted as microwave energy, much of the energy would be lost because the large antenna required would not be able to concentrate the energy into a very small area on the ground to be received. Indeed, the antenna required to receive the energy on the ground would be much larger than just putting solar collectors on the ground. There would also be environmental concerns about transmitting huge amounts of energy over such a large area, and the potential dangers of the space transmitter missing the receiving antenna on the ground. Not the least of the problems is the very high cost of launching anything into space.A Brighter Future?Despite the competitive disadvantage that solar energy technologies have right now, the availability of "free" sunlight will remain a driving force behind the development of new ideas that can make solar power more affordable in the future. As economies of scale are achieved in the manufacture of solar collection devices (both thermal and electric), and as petroleum prices gradually rise, solar energy will become more cost competitive. |
Replies
Thanks for wonderful analysis
Subsidy regime is getting eroded through PPP. Now we are in phase of PPPP (Public-Private-People/Professional Partnership) mode. Let us prepare ourselves. What we can (People/Professional) contribute for planet protection and prosperity is to be focal for us. Let us think in new 4P mode, contrary to PP or PPP mode. Let us know more what Global Agency, Governments and GreenCorporates are doing in solar field so that we can focus and find place of our contribution. India is no more Globally isolated country in the world rather its professional lead the globe. Know what global professional think and prepare themselves for solar power sector.
Brijesh Kumar Singh said:
Very True. But still a lot to do for the refinement of the available technology to make it more efficient as well as cheaper for the use of common man. Still the corporates are only investing in the greed of subsidies being given by government only. There is an urgent need for serious investment in R&D as well as implementation of the technology.
Dr Shailendra Pratap Singh said:
Big corporates are coming in the solar power sector and PPP will be business model. Available solar knowledge and technology is sufficient enough to make it comparable to fossile one within a decade. The legal framework is in place with CERC role on regulating tariff. We professional should be prepared enough to see the environmental consequences of solar power A2Z processes and use compared to other sources of power at further deeper level. 4G4P would be soon in place in form of PPPP for accelared growth in generation and use of solar power by 2020.
The real way to use solar energy is one that would revolutionize India, and yet is still stuck in files. Rooftop solar is the way to go. Germany installed 17,000 MW since its inception, and it is the backbone of their renewable energy sector. We can certainly produce much more solar power than them, but the lack of clear policies on this front ensures that it will never take off.
While appreciating the discussions it is surprising that ....
BP closing solar unit, leaving industry after 40 years, citing economy's impact on solar industry as deterrents to long-term profits; unit to shutter over the course of next few months, shed 100 jobs
Thanks Brijesh for a informative writeup.